Opening service of the 1st WCC Assembly in Nieuwe Kerk, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Photo: WCC Photo archive. (22 Aug. 1948)

Archives

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1991
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1983
1982
1968
1967
1964

Bluesky

We invite you to visit our new Bluesky feed, a social media platform that replaces Twitter/X. Bluesky has reintroduced content moderation and eliminated advertizing. Follow us now on Bluesky.

Subscribe to our news

Email Address

First Name

Last Name

Search the website Rechercher dans le site

From the Ashes of War: The first WCC Assembly in Europe – Amsterdam 1948

As participants in the First Assembly of the World Council of Churches (WCC) gathered at Amsterdam during August 1948, the Netherlands bore witness to the violence of the Second World War. The port of Rotterdam was rising from near destruction. Many other cities, towns and villages across Europe were struggling to recover. To the east, Germany and Austria were divided into zones of occupation administered by the Allied Powers. Two months earlier, tensions between the Soviet Union and the Western occupiers of the former German capital led to the start of the Berlin Airlift. Since 1945, publications had been increasing their use of the term “Cold War”.

In contemplating a first WCC assembly in continental Europe, organizers faced the question of how fellowship could be reestablished among citizens of countries so recently at one another’s throats. Protestant leaders meeting in October 1945 debated and adopted the Stuttgart Declaration of Guilt, confessing that shared suffering among the people of a nation implies there also is shared guilt. In the words of the declaration, “We accuse ourselves for not witnessing more courageously, for not praying more faithfully, for not believing more joyously and for not loving more ardently.” Among the ecumenical leaders who argued in favour of this basis for reconciliation were W. A. Visser ‘t Hooft, Karl Bath, Martin Niemoeller and other former activists in the Confessing Church.

Attempts to attract Assembly participation from Orthodox Churches in the evolving Eastern Bloc countries were not as successful. And the process would be disrupted by developments in China, Korea and throughout the international community. It would take more than a decade of church diplomacy, and a relaxing of national anxiety, before Eastern Orthodox Churches would join the WCC at the Third Assembly in New Delhi.

Ramifications of war have been among the key forces that shape the direction of the modern ecumenical movement. The Edinburgh Missionary Conference of 1910 was a seminal event in the birth of this movement, and there was widespread enthusiasm afterwards for the formation of a council for the coordination of missions; however, the First World War shifted the focus of Christians over the coming decade. In a parallel experience, plans for a world council of churches, combining responsibilities for “Faith and Order” and “Life and Work”, were laid in 1937 and 1938; because of another global conflagration, the First Assembly of the WCC had to wait until the summer of 1948.

The founding member churches numbered 147, represented at the First Assembly by 351 voting delegates. The great majority of these churches were located in Western Europe and North America. Only 30 of the founding churches were from Africa, Asia and Latin America.

Planners had adopted the assembly theme “Man’s disorder and God’s design”. The chaotic state of postwar conditions was evident all around, but what message might the churches have regarding a divine purpose and role in daily life?

Encouraging study of the contemporary situation in the light of Christian traditions, the World Council of Churches in Process of Formation produced volumes of scholarly articles for study in churches and

theological faculties. The areas of discussion, mirroring the Sections that would deliberate at the Assembly, fell into the categories (1) the universal church in God’s design, (2) the church’s witness to God’s design, (3) the church and the disorder of society, (4) the church and the international order.

Some conclusions on these topics now seem rudimentary, often calling for further dialogue among the churches. Perhaps the underlying theme of this first assembly was that there was much more to be done, and that it must be undertaken by Christians pledged to unity.

Although women delegates to the First Assembly were few in number, Kathleen Bliss of the Church of England chaired the assembly committee on the laity and was a member of the Message committee. The Amsterdam Message deserves its place in the collection of essential ecumenical documents. Early in the discussion of its drafting, Bliss suggested a phrase that became the best-known line to come out of the First Assembly: “We intend to stay together.”

Studies on the nature of the church would provide rich opportunities for ecumenical theology, and ecclesiological progress would continue with the WCC’s Toronto Statement of 1950. The call for unity in mission, evangelism and the education of lay people explored a dimension of unity that would be formalized years later with the union of the WCC, the International Mission Council and eventually the World Council on Christian Education. The ideal of a “responsible society” was one step along the way of ecumenical social thought, leading toward additional insight as the demographics of the fellowship broadened. We continue to ponder the implications of First Assembly statements in the social sphere, not least the assertion that war is “contrary to the will of God”.

War in Europe was in the minds of ecumenists at Amsterdam: a recent, terrible war and the looming potential for violence between East and West. The Eleventh Assembly of the WCC, the third held in Europe, convenes in the shadow of a devastating war between Russia and Ukraine. Once again, people and churches are arrayed on opposing sides. As in Amsterdam, those attending the assembly ask themselves, “What can we say? What can we do? Can we hope to make a genuine difference? In the face of such disorder, how are we to proclaim God’s design?”

Posted: Aug. 26, 2022 • Permanent link: ecumenism.net/?p=12506
Categories: Conferences, Opinion • In this article: WCC, WCC Assembly Transmis : 26 aoüt 2022 • Lien permanente : ecumenism.net/?p=12506
Catégorie : Conferences, Opinion • Dans cet article : WCC, WCC Assembly